Timeline
  • 2019Design
  • 2020Design
  • 2021Design
  • 2022Implementation
  • 2023Implementation
  • 2024Implementation
ID number
29867

Background

A brief overview of the context and rationale of the policy development, explaining why it is implemented or why it is important.

At the end of 2017, the Austrian National Strategy for the validation of non-formal and informal learning was published. It had been developed under the coordination of the Ministry of Education in cooperation with many stakeholders. This strategy is based on the Council's Recommendation of the same name (2012/C 398/01), in which the EU Member States are invited to develop nationally coordinated approaches and processes with which competences can be made more visible and thus validated.

In Austria, there are several qualifications in which validation plays a role in the assessment procedure. A few of these qualifications can also be obtained entirely through validation. The national strategy offers a strategic framework for the development, coordination and network-building of all validation offers. It is the aim of the strategy and its related activities to promote all validation approaches and present them as examples/models for other qualifications. Overall, the quality of validation approaches, as well as the trust in this type of assessment, should be enhanced.

A key quality aspect within validation is the qualification profile of validation experts: what knowledge, skills, transversal competences and attitudes must they be able to demonstrate to validate learning.

Objectives

Goals and objectives of the policy development.

The main objectives are:

  1. the definition of a qualification profile for validation experts;
  2. the contribution to quality assurance within validation processes.

Description

What/How/Who/For whom/When of the policy development in detail, explaining its activities and annual progress, main actors and target groups.

Since the validation strategy should encourage qualification providers to include validation elements in assessment procedures, the Ministry of Education took the initiative to draw up a qualification profile for validation experts. Thus, at the beginning of 2019 it commissioned two VET research institutes (ibw and öibf) with this task, assigning the responsibility for this project to wba (Weiterbildungsakademie) - the validation centre for adult learning experts.

Within this project, a qualification profile shall be developed for validation experts to consider the various roles these experts can have in validation processes (counsellors, assessors) and the aims of validation (formative and summative approaches). The first draft of this profile shall be evaluated in terms of its practicability/usability/comprehension with stakeholders, provider institutions and validation experts. Moreover, it shall be discussed how this qualification could be implemented in the Austrian qualification system (qualification provider, provision of know-how, etc.) and how it can be assessed (via non-formal learning, through validation, etc.).

What are the main activities in this project?

  1. analysis of validation approaches in Austria to categorise/map the approaches;
  2. interviews with validation experts about their work and required know-how;
  3. drafting of a qualification profile (QP) based on the information gathered;
  4. discussing the QP draft with...

Since the validation strategy should encourage qualification providers to include validation elements in assessment procedures, the Ministry of Education took the initiative to draw up a qualification profile for validation experts. Thus, at the beginning of 2019 it commissioned two VET research institutes (ibw and öibf) with this task, assigning the responsibility for this project to wba (Weiterbildungsakademie) - the validation centre for adult learning experts.

Within this project, a qualification profile shall be developed for validation experts to consider the various roles these experts can have in validation processes (counsellors, assessors) and the aims of validation (formative and summative approaches). The first draft of this profile shall be evaluated in terms of its practicability/usability/comprehension with stakeholders, provider institutions and validation experts. Moreover, it shall be discussed how this qualification could be implemented in the Austrian qualification system (qualification provider, provision of know-how, etc.) and how it can be assessed (via non-formal learning, through validation, etc.).

What are the main activities in this project?

  1. analysis of validation approaches in Austria to categorise/map the approaches;
  2. interviews with validation experts about their work and required know-how;
  3. drafting of a qualification profile (QP) based on the information gathered;
  4. discussing the QP draft with stakeholders, provider institutions and validation experts in terms of its practicability, usability, comprehension;
  5. fine-tuning/finalising of the QP.

Who should benefit from this project?

  1. stakeholders;
  2. validation experts;
  3. training providers.

When should this initiative be implemented?

  1. the QP should be finalised by December 2021;
  2. for the implementation into the qualification system, there is no specific timeline.

This initiative (and thus this project) is connected to the national validation strategy issued at the end of 2017. It has not yet been decided how the results of this project (i.e. the qualification profile) will be implemented in the Austrian qualification system and if it will be turned into a government-regulated qualification (i.e. laid down in a law or directive).

In 2020, the project will enter its implementation phase. So far, desk research is being done into validation approaches and interviews are being conducted with validation experts. A first draft of the qualification profile will be available for discussion in autumn 2020.

2019
Design

In 2019, the research work for the development and the preparation for a first draft of the qualification profile was done.

2020
Design

In 2020, 10 interviews were conducted with experts representing qualifications in which various forms of validation play a role. For the analysis of these interviews, the project partners created an analysis grid. Based on the results of this analysis, the first draft of a qualification profile (QP) for validation experts was developed and discussed within the project partnership and with the promoters.

2021
Design

In 2021, the feedback from the field experts was used to improve the draft version of the qualification profile and discuss it in workshops with providers of qualifications in which validation elements are used. The feedback was incorporated into the qualification profile.

2022
Implementation

At the beginning of 2022 the qualification profile was finalised. It is now up to the Ministry of Education to take further steps, i.e. to push ahead with implementation in the Austrian qualification landscape.

2023
Implementation

A follow-up project was commissioned in 2023.

In July 2023 the follow-up project started with a revision of the qualification profile in order to make it learning-outcome oriented and suitable as a basis for a certification procedure for validation practitioners.

2024
Implementation

In 2024 a first draft for a certification procedure was developed in an intensive dialogue between the project partners and on basis of an analysis of existing relevant training and certification instruments in the field.

Bodies responsible

This section lists main bodies that are responsible for the implementation of the policy development or for its specific parts or activities, as indicated in the regulatory acts. The responsibilities are usually explained in its description.
  • Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF)
  • Austrian Academy of Continuing Education (wba)

Target groups

Those who are positively and directly affected by the measures of the policy development; those on the list are specifically defined in the EU VET policy documents. A policy development can be addressed to one or several target groups.

Entities providing VET

  • VET providers (all kinds)

Thematic categories

Thematic categories capture main aspects of the decision-making and operation of national VET and LLL systems. These broad areas represent key elements that all VET and LLL systems have to different extents and in different combinations, and which come into focus depending on the EU and national priorities. Thematic categories are further divided into thematic sub-categories. Based on their description, policy developments can be assigned to one or several thematic categories.

Governance of VET and lifelong learning

This thematic category looks at existing legal frameworks providing for strategic, operational – including quality assurance – and financing arrangements for VET and lifelong learning (LLL). It examines how VET and LLL-related policies are placed in broad national socioeconomic contexts and coordinate with other strategies and policies, such as economic, social and employment, growth and innovation, recovery and resilience.

This thematic category covers partnerships and collaboration networks of VET stakeholders – especially the social partners – to shape and implement VET in a country, including looking at how their roles and responsibilities for VET at national, regional and local levels are shared and distributed, ensuring an appropriate degree of autonomy for VET providers to adapt their offer.

The thematic category also includes efforts to create national, regional and sectoral skills intelligence systems (skills anticipation and graduate tracking) and using skills intelligence for making decisions about VET and LLL on quality, inclusiveness and flexibility.

Further developing national quality assurance systems

This thematic sub-category refers to further development of national quality assurance (QA) systems for IVET and CVET, for all learning environments (school-based provision and work-based learning, including apprenticeships) and all learning types (digital, face-to-face or blended), delivered by both public and private providers. These systems are underpinned by the EQAVET quality criteria and by indicative descriptors applied both at system and provider levels, as defined in Annex II of the VET Recommendation. The sub-category concerns creating and improving external and self-evaluation of VET providers, and establishing criteria of QA, accreditation of providers and programmes. It also covers the activities of Quality assurance national reference points for VET on implementing and further developing the EQAVET framework, including the implementation of peer reviews at VET system level.

Modernising VET offer and delivery

This thematic category looks at what and how individuals learn, how learning content and learning outcomes in initial and continuing VET are defined, adapted and updated. First and foremost, it examines how VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses are updated and modernised or new ones created. Updated and renewed VET content ensures that learners acquire a balanced mix of competences that address modern demands, and are more closely aligned with the realities of the labour market, including key competences, digital competences and skills for green transition and sustainability, both sector-specific and across sectors. Using learning outcomes as a basis is important to facilitate this modernisation, including modularisation of VET programmes. Updating and developing teaching and learning materials to support the above is also part of the category.

The thematic category continues to focus on strengthening high-quality and inclusive apprenticeships and work-based learning in real-life work environments and in line with the European framework for quality and effective apprenticeships. It looks at expanding apprenticeship to continuing vocational training and at developing VET programmes at EQF levels 5-8 for better permeability and lifelong learning and to support the need for higher vocational skills.

This thematic category also focuses on VET delivery through a mix of open, digital and participative learning environments, including workplaces conducive to learning, which are flexible, more adaptable to the ways individuals learn, and provide more access and outreach to various groups of learners, diversifying modes of learning and exploiting the potential of digital learning solutions and blended learning to complement face-to-face learning.

Centres of vocational excellence that connect VET to innovation and skill ecosystems and facilitate stronger cooperation with business and research also fall into this category.

Modernising VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses

VET standards and curricula define the content and outcomes of learning, most often at national or sectoral levels. VET programmes are based on standards and curricula and refer to specific vocations/occupations. They all need to be regularly reviewed, updated and aligned with the needs of the labour market and society. They need to include a balanced mix of vocational and technical skills corresponding to economic cycles, evolving jobs and working methods, and key competences, providing for resilience, lifelong learning, employability, social inclusion, active citizenship, sustainable awareness and personal development (Council of the European Union, 2020). The thematic sub-category also refers to establishing new VET programmes, reducing their number or discontinuing some. It also includes design of CVET programmes and training courses to adapt to labour market, sectoral or individual up- and re-skilling needs.

Transparency and portability of VET skills and qualifications

European principles and tools, such as EQF, ESCO, ECTS, Europass and ECVET, provide a strong basis for transparency and portability of national and sectoral qualifications across Europe, including the issuing of digital diplomas and certificates.

This thematic category looks at how individuals are supported in transferring, accumulating, and validating skills and competences acquired in formal, non-formal and informal settings – including learning on the job – and in having their learning recognised towards a qualification at any point of their lives. This is only possible if qualifications are transparent and comparable and are part of comprehensive national qualifications frameworks. Availability of qualifications smaller than full and acquirable in shorter periods of time is necessary; some countries have recently worked on developing partial qualifications, microcredentials, etc.

Learners' possibilities of accumulation, validation and recognition of learning outcomes acquired non-formally and informally

This thematic sub-category refers to validation mechanisms allowing individuals to accumulate, transfer, and recognise learning outcomes acquired non-formally and informally, including on-the-job learning, or in another formal system. In case they are not automatically recognised, a learner can have these learning outcomes validated and recognised through a particular process with a view to obtaining a partial or full qualification. This thematic sub-category covers such provisions and mechanisms. 

Subsystem

Part of the vocational education and training and lifelong learning systems the policy development applies to.
IVET
CVET

Further reading

Sources for further reading where readers can find more information on policy developments: links to official documents, dedicated websites, project pages. Some sources may only be available in national languages.

Country

Type of development

Policy developments are divided into three types: strategy/action plan; regulation/legislation; and practical measure/initiative.
Practical measure/Initiative
Cite as

Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Qualification profile for validation experts: Austria. In Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Timeline of VET policies in Europe (2024 update) [Online tool].

https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/29867