- 2023Completed
Background
The establishment of a European quality assurance reference framework for vocational education and training has stimulated vocational education and training (VET) reforms in EU Member States, contributing to improving quality assurance (QA) in VET systems across Europe. However, there remains a need to address the transparency of quality assurance arrangements at system level, an area that requires further attention and work. The introduction of peer reviews can support this procedure.
Objectives
According to the 2020 VET recommendation, peer reviews are aimed at improving mutual learning, increasing the transparency and consistency of quality assurance arrangements in the provision of VET and reinforcing mutual trust between EU Member States.
Description
In the 2020 VET recommendation peer reviews are described as 'a type of voluntary mutual learning activity supporting improvement and transparency of quality assurance arrangements at system level. The are not aiming at accreditation procedures based on a specific methodology to be developed by the European Network for quality assurance in vocational education and training'.
A peer review offers the chance to the country hosting it to reflect on its practices of quality assuring its national VET system. Peers from other Member States act as critical friends, offering external feedback and sharing thematic relevant experiences from their country.
The eleventh EQAVET Peer Review was hosted online by the VET Directorate of the Ministry of Education and Science in Bulgaria on 21-22 February 2023.
Nine EQAVET Network members from Belgium-Flanders, Croatia, Czechia, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, and Slovakia participated as peers.
The VET system in Bulgaria has been undergoing development, focusing on addressing practical needs to update VET programmes to reflect structural and other changes in the labour market.
Due to the green and digital transitions, many industries will need to comply with new regulations and workers will need retraining for other occupations.
The peer review focused on how to:
- identify mechanisms and criteria for training needs in the Bulgarian labour market;
- identify skills assessments, anticipation tools, and methods for data collection to develop effective VET programmes In Bulgaria;
- fruitfully engage with social partners in the development of curricula;
- stimulate employer and employee representatives to be more actively involved in the qualification design cycle.
The peers discussed that the initial phases of planning have already created a strong basis for the work. It focused on barriers to implementation.
Bodies responsible
- Ministry of Education and Science
Target groups
Altele
Thematic categories
Governance of VET and lifelong learning
This thematic category looks at existing legal frameworks providing for strategic, operational – including quality assurance – and financing arrangements for VET and lifelong learning (LLL). It examines how VET and LLL-related policies are placed in broad national socioeconomic contexts and coordinate with other strategies and policies, such as economic, social and employment, growth and innovation, recovery and resilience.
This thematic category covers partnerships and collaboration networks of VET stakeholders – especially the social partners – to shape and implement VET in a country, including looking at how their roles and responsibilities for VET at national, regional and local levels are shared and distributed, ensuring an appropriate degree of autonomy for VET providers to adapt their offer.
The thematic category also includes efforts to create national, regional and sectoral skills intelligence systems (skills anticipation and graduate tracking) and using skills intelligence for making decisions about VET and LLL on quality, inclusiveness and flexibility.
This thematic sub-category refers both to formal mechanisms of stakeholder engagement in VET governance and to informal cooperation among stakeholders, which motivate shared responsibility for quality VET. Formal engagement is usually based on legally established institutional procedures that clearly define the role and responsibilities for relevant stakeholders in designing, implementing and improving VET. It also refers to establishing and increasing the degree of autonomy of VET providers for agile and flexible VET provision.
In terms of informal cooperation, the sub-category covers targeted actions by different stakeholders to promote or implement VET. This cooperation often leads to creating sustainable partnerships and making commitments for targeted actions, in line with the national context and regulation, e.g. national alliances for apprenticeships, pacts for youth or partnerships between schools and employers. It can also include initiatives and projects run by the social partners or sectoral organisations or networks of voluntary experts and executives, retired or on sabbatical, to support their peers in the fields of VET and apprenticeships, as part of the EAfA.
High-quality and timely skills intelligence is a powerful policy tool, helping improve economic competitiveness and fostering social progress and equality through the provision of targeted skills training to all citizens (Cedefop, 2020). Skills intelligence is the outcome of an expert-driven process of identifying, analysing, synthesising and presenting quantitative and/or qualitative skills and labour market information. Skills intelligence draws on data from multiple sources, such as graduate tracking systems, skills anticipation mechanisms, including at sectoral and regional levels. Actions related to establishing and developing such systems fall under this thematic sub-category.
Modernising VET offer and delivery
This thematic category looks at what and how individuals learn, how learning content and learning outcomes in initial and continuing VET are defined, adapted and updated. First and foremost, it examines how VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses are updated and modernised or new ones created. Updated and renewed VET content ensures that learners acquire a balanced mix of competences that address modern demands, and are more closely aligned with the realities of the labour market, including key competences, digital competences and skills for green transition and sustainability, both sector-specific and across sectors. Using learning outcomes as a basis is important to facilitate this modernisation, including modularisation of VET programmes. Updating and developing teaching and learning materials to support the above is also part of the category.
The thematic category continues to focus on strengthening high-quality and inclusive apprenticeships and work-based learning in real-life work environments and in line with the European framework for quality and effective apprenticeships. It looks at expanding apprenticeship to continuing vocational training and at developing VET programmes at EQF levels 5-8 for better permeability and lifelong learning and to support the need for higher vocational skills.
This thematic category also focuses on VET delivery through a mix of open, digital and participative learning environments, including workplaces conducive to learning, which are flexible, more adaptable to the ways individuals learn, and provide more access and outreach to various groups of learners, diversifying modes of learning and exploiting the potential of digital learning solutions and blended learning to complement face-to-face learning.
Centres of vocational excellence that connect VET to innovation and skill ecosystems and facilitate stronger cooperation with business and research also fall into this category.
VET standards and curricula define the content and outcomes of learning, most often at national or sectoral levels. VET programmes are based on standards and curricula and refer to specific vocations/occupations. They all need to be regularly reviewed, updated and aligned with the needs of the labour market and society. They need to include a balanced mix of vocational and technical skills corresponding to economic cycles, evolving jobs and working methods, and key competences, providing for resilience, lifelong learning, employability, social inclusion, active citizenship, sustainable awareness and personal development (Council of the European Union, 2020). The thematic sub-category also refers to establishing new VET programmes, reducing their number or discontinuing some. It also includes design of CVET programmes and training courses to adapt to labour market, sectoral or individual up- and re-skilling needs.
Subsystem
Further reading
Country
Type of development
Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). EQAVET peer review on ensuring labour market relevance of VET: Bulgaria. In Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Timeline of VET policies in Europe (2024 update) [Online tool].
https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/ro/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/45485