Timeline
  • 2019Implementation
  • 2020Implementation
ID number
28666

Background

A brief overview of the context and rationale of the policy development, explaining why it is implemented or why it is important.

Education and training provision in Malta is experiencing a significant paradigm shift towards learning outcomes. Courses accredited by the National Commission for Further and Higher Education (NCFHE) (the name changed to Malta Further and Higher Education Authority (MFHEA) in 2021) and those by self-accrediting training providers use the learning outcomes approach. Most of the course descriptions offered in Malta are described in terms of learning outcomes: this is the case for the state VET providers, MCAST and ITS, and the University of Malta. The licensed private further and higher education institutions, whose courses are accredited by NCFHE, are also described in terms of learning outcomes.

Within compulsory education, the learning outcomes framework (LOF) is a development from the national curriculum framework (NCF). The NCF addressed the gaps in Malta's learning processes where emphasis shifted from teaching the subject to teaching the learner. It also seeks to present a seamless curriculum that reflects smooth transitions, building and extending on the firm foundations in early childhood education. It proposed a LOF as the keystone for learning and assessment throughout the years of compulsory schooling to free schools and learners from centrally-imposed knowledge-centric syllabi; it will also give them the freedom to develop programmes that fulfil the framework of knowledge, attitudes and skills-based outcomes that are considered national education entitlement of all learners in Malta.

Objectives

Goals and objectives of the policy development.

The EQF and MQF learning outcome descriptors promote transparency and comparability of qualifications of different national systems. This shift towards a learning outcomes orientation in education and training aims to help learners to progress in learning by facilitating flexible learning pathways and transfer across different levels and types of education and training and across national borders; this enables learners to accumulate and transfer different learning outcomes acquired in different learning contexts, including online, non-formal and informal learning. The learning outcomes approach can also facilitate the design, delivery and assessment of full qualifications or components of qualifications.

Description

What/How/Who/For whom/When of the policy development in detail, explaining its activities and annual progress, main actors and target groups.

The compulsory education system has reviewed all its curricula in terms of learning outcomes and will be introducing them as from the academic year 2019-20.

2019
Implementation

In October 2019, the new syllabi using learning outcomes were introduced/continued to be implemented in kindergarden 1 and 2, Years 3 and 4 and Year 7 and Year 8.

2020
Implementation

In line with the 2017 Council recommendation on the EQF, the NCFHE launched the Malta qualifications database in November 2020, which includes all accredited programmes including VET, and non-formal and informal learning with the respective MQF/EQF levels. The aim of this database is to provide easily accessible information on study programmes for the public. All study programmes indicate the learning outcomes related to them and these are also available publicly. This would increase visibility and understanding of the importance of defining learning outcomes for study programmes.

During 2020, the NCFHE updated the number of national occupational standards (NOS) to 80 in seven different roles. The NOSs are based on the learning outcomes approach. These are a set of job-related standards that highlight the performance expected when carrying out a specific occupation at a specific level. These standards define the main jobs that people carry out and link qualifications to the labour market; they are useful to employers, employees and in curriculum design. These national occupational standards are also available on the Malta qualifications database.

Bodies responsible

This section lists main bodies that are responsible for the implementation of the policy development or for its specific parts or activities, as indicated in the regulatory acts. The responsibilities are usually explained in its description.
  • Ministry for Education (MFED)(until 2022)
  • Malta Further and Higher Education Authority (MFHEA)
  • Ministry of Education and Employment (MEDE) (until 2020)
  • National Commission for Further and Higher Education (NCFHE) (until 2021)

Target groups

Those who are positively and directly affected by the measures of the policy development; those on the list are specifically defined in the EU VET policy documents. A policy development can be addressed to one or several target groups.

Thematic categories

Thematic categories capture main aspects of the decision-making and operation of national VET and LLL systems. These broad areas represent key elements that all VET and LLL systems have to different extents and in different combinations, and which come into focus depending on the EU and national priorities. Thematic categories are further divided into thematic sub-categories. Based on their description, policy developments can be assigned to one or several thematic categories.

Modernising VET offer and delivery

This thematic category looks at what and how individuals learn, how learning content and learning outcomes in initial and continuing VET are defined, adapted and updated. First and foremost, it examines how VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses are updated and modernised or new ones created. Updated and renewed VET content ensures that learners acquire a balanced mix of competences that address modern demands, and are more closely aligned with the realities of the labour market, including key competences, digital competences and skills for green transition and sustainability, both sector-specific and across sectors. Using learning outcomes as a basis is important to facilitate this modernisation, including modularisation of VET programmes. Updating and developing teaching and learning materials to support the above is also part of the category.

The thematic category continues to focus on strengthening high-quality and inclusive apprenticeships and work-based learning in real-life work environments and in line with the European framework for quality and effective apprenticeships. It looks at expanding apprenticeship to continuing vocational training and at developing VET programmes at EQF levels 5-8 for better permeability and lifelong learning and to support the need for higher vocational skills.

This thematic category also focuses on VET delivery through a mix of open, digital and participative learning environments, including workplaces conducive to learning, which are flexible, more adaptable to the ways individuals learn, and provide more access and outreach to various groups of learners, diversifying modes of learning and exploiting the potential of digital learning solutions and blended learning to complement face-to-face learning.

Centres of vocational excellence that connect VET to innovation and skill ecosystems and facilitate stronger cooperation with business and research also fall into this category.

Modernising VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses

VET standards and curricula define the content and outcomes of learning, most often at national or sectoral levels. VET programmes are based on standards and curricula and refer to specific vocations/occupations. They all need to be regularly reviewed, updated and aligned with the needs of the labour market and society. They need to include a balanced mix of vocational and technical skills corresponding to economic cycles, evolving jobs and working methods, and key competences, providing for resilience, lifelong learning, employability, social inclusion, active citizenship, sustainable awareness and personal development (Council of the European Union, 2020). The thematic sub-category also refers to establishing new VET programmes, reducing their number or discontinuing some. It also includes design of CVET programmes and training courses to adapt to labour market, sectoral or individual up- and re-skilling needs.

Using learning-outcome-based approaches and modularisation

The learning-outcomes-based approaches focus on what a learner is expected to know, to be able to do and understand at the end of a learning process (Cedefop, 2016). Learning outcomes can be defined at the system level as in national qualification frameworks (NQFs), most of which are currently based on learning outcomes. Learning outcomes can be defined in qualification standards, curricula, learning programmes and assessment, although the last one is still uncommon. This thematic sub-category refers to the use of learning outcomes in these contexts and to development and use of modules or units of learning outcomes in VET curricula and programmes.

Transparency and portability of VET skills and qualifications

European principles and tools, such as EQF, ESCO, ECTS, Europass and ECVET, provide a strong basis for transparency and portability of national and sectoral qualifications across Europe, including the issuing of digital diplomas and certificates.

This thematic category looks at how individuals are supported in transferring, accumulating, and validating skills and competences acquired in formal, non-formal and informal settings – including learning on the job – and in having their learning recognised towards a qualification at any point of their lives. This is only possible if qualifications are transparent and comparable and are part of comprehensive national qualifications frameworks. Availability of qualifications smaller than full and acquirable in shorter periods of time is necessary; some countries have recently worked on developing partial qualifications, microcredentials, etc.

Comprehensive national qualification frameworks

This thematic sub-category concerns all developments related to national qualification frameworks (NQFs). As in most countries NQFs are in place and referenced to the European qualifications framework (EQF), the thematic sub-category covers updating and expanding the frameworks, developing new qualifications and using NQFs as catalysts for other reforms.

Developing and applying qualifications smaller/shorter than full

This thematic sub-category refers to the development and implementation of qualifications  that are smaller than full qualifications (alternative credentials) or are acquired in a shorter learning experience. It includes microcredentials, partial qualifications, units of learning outcomes (ECVET principle), digital badges, etc. These are owned by learners and can be combined or not to get a full qualification.

Subsystem

Part of the vocational education and training and lifelong learning systems the policy development applies to.
IVET

Further reading

Sources for further reading where readers can find more information on policy developments: links to official documents, dedicated websites, project pages. Some sources may only be available in national languages.

Country

Type of development

Policy developments are divided into three types: strategy/action plan; regulation/legislation; and practical measure/initiative.
Practical measure/Initiative
Cite as

Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Establishing the learning outcomes approach in curricula: Malta. In Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Timeline of VET policies in Europe (2024 update) [Online tool].

https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/28666