Timeline
  • 2016Implementation
  • 2017Implementation
  • 2018Implementation
  • 2019Implementation
  • 2020Implementation
  • 2021Implementation
  • 2022Implementation
  • 2023Implementation
  • 2024Implementation
ID number
28116

Background

A brief overview of the context and rationale of the policy development, explaining why it is implemented or why it is important.

Due to the heterogeneous continuing education and training landscape, there was a need for a coordination platform for the exchange of information on CVET.

Objectives

Goals and objectives of the policy development.

Wbmonitor seeks to contribute to a greater overview of the continuing education and training landscape and to track changes taking place.

Description

What/How/Who/For whom/When of the policy development in detail, explaining its activities and annual progress, main actors and target groups.

The online platform wbmonitor, operated by BIBB and the German Institute for Adult Education (DIE), conducts a yearly survey of public and private CVET providers. The surveys have a yearly focus and monitor labour market developments and helps identify training needs. The platform also publishes a Continuing training survey climate index.

2016
Implementation
2017
Implementation
2018
Implementation
2019
Implementation

In 2019, the survey focused on digitalisation. The wbmonitor was interested in the use of digital technology and media by CVET providers, with a particular focus on the teaching-learning process and the digital skills of teachers. BIBB and DIE also collected information on the CVET courses offered by these institutions to help shape and manage the digital transformation of the economy and society.

2020
Implementation

With the thematic focus 2020, wbmonitor examined the consequences of the pandemic from the first lockdown until the summer of 2020. The effects of the Corona pandemic have far-reaching consequences for the continuing education and training sector. Accordingly, in the wbmonitor survey conducted by BIBB and DIE in the summer of 2020, continuing education and training providers assessed their economic situation as significantly worse than in the previous year.

2021
Implementation

In 2021, wbmonitor focused on digital continuing education offers against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, which acted as an accelerator of change. Wbmonitor poses the question as to whether providers are planning a sustainable change in the ratio of face-to-face, blended learning, compared to purely online offerings, and how the conversion to digital formats will take place during the COVID-19 pandemic for different types of events. The Investment in digital infrastructure and its financing are also addressed.

2022
Implementation

Publication of the 2022 report. The report is based on data of 2021 and focused on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CVET.

2023
Implementation

Against the backdrop of the accelerated digitalisation caused by the pandemic, the 2022 wbmonitor survey focused on the 'Changing continuing education market' and examined questions about the market situation of CVET providers as well as related strategies and innovations. The key findings are summarised in the BIBB Datenreport 2023 (Chapter B2.1, p 321-339).

The focus of the wbmonitor 2023 survey was on the one hand on the current economic challenges facing further education providers, some of which were related to the energy crisis. On the other hand, it looked at continuing education programmes in the context of the ecological transformation of the economy and society. In addition, wbmonitor was interested in the providers' own sustainability measures.

As every year, the economic climate in the continuing education sector and basic structural data on providers were also surveyed. The results are based on the weighted and extrapolated data from 1 172 organisations.

2024
Implementation

The key findings of the wbmonitor 2023 survey and of the survey on economic climate in the CVET sector are summarised in the BIBB Datenreport 2024 (Chapter B2.1, p 321-335).

Bodies responsible

This section lists main bodies that are responsible for the implementation of the policy development or for its specific parts or activities, as indicated in the regulatory acts. The responsibilities are usually explained in its description.
  • Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BIBB)
  • German Institute for Adult Education (DIE)

Target groups

Those who are positively and directly affected by the measures of the policy development; those on the list are specifically defined in the EU VET policy documents. A policy development can be addressed to one or several target groups.

Learners

  • Adult learners

Education professionals

  • Adult educators

Thematic categories

Thematic categories capture main aspects of the decision-making and operation of national VET and LLL systems. These broad areas represent key elements that all VET and LLL systems have to different extents and in different combinations, and which come into focus depending on the EU and national priorities. Thematic categories are further divided into thematic sub-categories. Based on their description, policy developments can be assigned to one or several thematic categories.

Governance of VET and lifelong learning

This thematic category looks at existing legal frameworks providing for strategic, operational – including quality assurance – and financing arrangements for VET and lifelong learning (LLL). It examines how VET and LLL-related policies are placed in broad national socioeconomic contexts and coordinate with other strategies and policies, such as economic, social and employment, growth and innovation, recovery and resilience.

This thematic category covers partnerships and collaboration networks of VET stakeholders – especially the social partners – to shape and implement VET in a country, including looking at how their roles and responsibilities for VET at national, regional and local levels are shared and distributed, ensuring an appropriate degree of autonomy for VET providers to adapt their offer.

The thematic category also includes efforts to create national, regional and sectoral skills intelligence systems (skills anticipation and graduate tracking) and using skills intelligence for making decisions about VET and LLL on quality, inclusiveness and flexibility.

Further developing national quality assurance systems

This thematic sub-category refers to further development of national quality assurance (QA) systems for IVET and CVET, for all learning environments (school-based provision and work-based learning, including apprenticeships) and all learning types (digital, face-to-face or blended), delivered by both public and private providers. These systems are underpinned by the EQAVET quality criteria and by indicative descriptors applied both at system and provider levels, as defined in Annex II of the VET Recommendation. The sub-category concerns creating and improving external and self-evaluation of VET providers, and establishing criteria of QA, accreditation of providers and programmes. It also covers the activities of Quality assurance national reference points for VET on implementing and further developing the EQAVET framework, including the implementation of peer reviews at VET system level.

Establishing and developing skills intelligence systems

High-quality and timely skills intelligence is a powerful policy tool, helping improve economic competitiveness and fostering social progress and equality through the provision of targeted skills training to all citizens (Cedefop, 2020). Skills intelligence is the outcome of an expert-driven process of identifying, analysing, synthesising and presenting quantitative and/or qualitative skills and labour market information. Skills intelligence draws on data from multiple sources, such as graduate tracking systems, skills anticipation mechanisms, including at sectoral and regional levels. Actions related to establishing and developing such systems fall under this thematic sub-category.

Subsystem

Part of the vocational education and training and lifelong learning systems the policy development applies to.
CVET

Further reading

Sources for further reading where readers can find more information on policy developments: links to official documents, dedicated websites, project pages. Some sources may only be available in national languages.

Country

Type of development

Policy developments are divided into three types: strategy/action plan; regulation/legislation; and practical measure/initiative.
Practical measure/Initiative
Cite as

Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Annual surveys among CVET providers: Germany. In Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Timeline of VET policies in Europe (2024 update) [Online tool].

https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/28116