Mobility scoreboard indicators
Indicators show how performance is distributed across countries. Performance is understood in terms of meeting the requirements of the 'Youth on the move' Recommendation. Ten 'thematic' and four 'transversal' indicators are presented. Each thematic indicator accounts for performance in a given thematic area. Transversal indicators account for countries’ performance in setting up overall targets for mobility policy, coordinating and evaluating mobility policy, and approaching mobility policy in a 'strategic' way. The indicators are qualitative. They sum up countries’ situation using a traffic light type colour code. The list of indicators includes the followings:
Thematic indicators
- Indicator 1
- Information and guidance
- Indicator 2
- Administrative and institutional issues
- Indicator 3
- Recognition of learning outcomes
- Indicator 4
- Partnerships and funding
- Indicator 5
- Motivating for mobility
- Indicator 6
- Long-term preparation for mobility
- Indicator 7
- Quality of mobility
- Indicator 8
- Portability of grants and loans
- Indicator 9
- Specific support to disadvantaged learners
- Indicator 10
- Involving multipliers
Transversal indicators
- Indicator 11
- Transversal performance in setting up targets for the mobility policy
- Indicator 12
- Transversal performance in coordinating the mobility policy
- Indicator 13
- Transversal performance in evaluating the mobility policy
- Indicator 14
- Transversal performance in terms of strategy
Please select an indicator. All countries are pre-selected by default. After selecting the required filters, click Apply to see the results.
Indicator 1 – Information and guidance ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Excellent performance | Sweden |
| Very good performance | Bulgaria Finland Luxembourg Norway United Kingdom |
| Good performance | Austria Belgium-DE Cyprus Estonia France Germany Greece Ireland Latvia Lithuania Netherlands Spain |
| Some progress has been made | Belgium Belgium-FR Croatia Czechia Denmark Hungary Iceland Malta Poland Romania Slovenia |
| Little progress has been made so far | Belgium-FL Italy Portugal Slovakia |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 2 – Administrative and institutional issues ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Very good performance | France |
| Good performance | Croatia Germany Netherlands |
| Some progress has been made | Austria Bulgaria Cyprus Czechia Denmark Finland Greece Hungary Iceland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Norway Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Sweden |
| Little progress has been made so far | Belgium Belgium-DE Belgium-FR Belgium-FL Estonia Ireland Poland Spain United Kingdom |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 3 - Recognition of learning outcomes ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Very good performance | Germany Norway Romania Sweden |
| Good performance | Bulgaria Estonia Finland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Netherlands Portugal Spain United Kingdom |
| Some progress has been made | Belgium-DE Belgium-FR Croatia Cyprus Czechia Denmark France Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Poland Slovenia |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium Belgium-FL Malta Slovakia |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 4 - Partnerships and funding ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Excellent performance | Sweden |
| Very good performance | Croatia Czechia Germany Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Norway United Kingdom |
| Good performance | Belgium Belgium-FR Cyprus Denmark Estonia Finland France Hungary Italy Malta Netherlands Poland Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain |
| Some progress has been made | Austria Belgium-DE Belgium-FL Bulgaria Iceland Ireland Portugal |
| Little progress has been made so far | Greece |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 5 – Motivating for mobility ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Very good performance | Germany Hungary |
| Good performance | Bulgaria Croatia Czechia Finland France Greece Lithuania Norway Portugal Sweden |
| Some progress has been made | Belgium-DE Cyprus Estonia Italy Latvia Luxembourg Netherlands Poland Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain United Kingdom |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium Belgium-FR Belgium-FL Denmark Iceland Ireland Malta |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 6 – Long-term preparation for mobility ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Very good performance | Estonia Finland France Germany Hungary Lithuania Norway Sweden United Kingdom |
| Good performance | Belgium-DE Bulgaria Czechia Iceland Italy Latvia Luxembourg Malta Poland Portugal Romania Slovenia |
| Some progress has been made | Cyprus Denmark Ireland Slovakia Spain |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium-FL Croatia |
| No data | Belgium Belgium-FR Greece Netherlands |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 7 - Quality of mobility ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Very good performance | Estonia Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Sweden |
| Good performance | Belgium-FR Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czechia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Italy Malta Norway Poland Romania Spain United Kingdom |
| Some progress has been made | Belgium Belgium-DE Netherlands Portugal Slovakia Slovenia |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium-FL Denmark Iceland Ireland |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 8 - Portability of grants and loans ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Very good performance | Denmark Germany Netherlands |
| Good performance | Bulgaria Cyprus Finland France Iceland Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Norway Poland Sweden |
| Some progress has been made | Czechia Hungary Italy Portugal Spain |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium Belgium-DE Belgium-FR Belgium-FL Croatia Estonia Greece Ireland Slovakia Slovenia United Kingdom |
| No data | Romania |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 9 – Specific support to disadvantaged learners ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Excellent performance | Finland |
| Very good performance | Estonia France Germany Lithuania |
| Good performance | Croatia Czechia Greece Latvia Norway Slovakia United Kingdom |
| Some progress has been made | Bulgaria Cyprus Denmark Hungary Luxembourg Poland Portugal Spain |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium Belgium-DE Belgium-FR Belgium-FL Iceland Ireland Italy Malta Netherlands Slovenia |
| No data | Romania Sweden |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 10 – Involving multipliers ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Good performance | Croatia Czechia Estonia Finland France Germany Lithuania Norway |
| Some progress has been made | Belgium-DE Bulgaria Cyprus Italy Latvia Luxembourg Malta Poland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium Belgium-FR Belgium-FL Denmark Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland United Kingdom |
| No data | Netherlands Romania |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 11 – Transversal performance in setting up targets for the mobility policy ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Good performance | Luxembourg |
| Some progress has been made | Belgium-DE Bulgaria Cyprus Czechia Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Latvia Lithuania Netherlands Spain Sweden United Kingdom |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium-FL Croatia Denmark Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Malta Norway Poland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia |
| No data | Belgium Belgium-FR Romania |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 12 – Transversal performance in coordinating the mobility policy ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Excellent performance | Germany |
| Very good performance | Estonia Finland France Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Netherlands Norway |
| Good performance | Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czechia Greece Hungary Italy Malta Poland United Kingdom |
| Some progress has been made | Belgium-DE Denmark Iceland Ireland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Spain |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium-FL |
| No data | Belgium Belgium-FR Romania Sweden |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Good performance | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 13 – Transversal performance in evaluating the mobility policy ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Very good performance | Finland Lithuania Norway |
| Good performance | Bulgaria Croatia Czechia France Germany Hungary United Kingdom |
| Some progress has been made | Belgium-DE Cyprus Denmark Estonia Greece Iceland Italy Latvia Luxembourg Malta Poland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Spain |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium-FL Ireland |
| No data | Belgium Belgium-FR Netherlands Romania Sweden |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |
Indicator 14 – Transversal performance in terms of strategy ( )
| Degree of closeness/distance to full implementation of Recommendation | Countries by level of performance |
|---|---|
| Good performance | Bulgaria Czechia Estonia Finland France Germany Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Norway United Kingdom |
| Some progress has been made | Belgium-DE Croatia Cyprus Denmark Greece Hungary Iceland Italy Malta Poland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Spain |
| Little progress has been made so far | Austria Belgium-FL Ireland |
| No data | Belgium Belgium-FR Netherlands Romania Sweden |
| Countries' average performance | |
|---|---|
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES |
| Some progress has been made | AVERAGE EU COUNTRIES+IS+NO |