Timeline
  • 2025Implementation
ID number
50473

Background

A brief overview of the context and rationale of the policy development, explaining why it is implemented or why it is important.

The initiative was launched to bring conceptual and operational clarity to the status of microcredentials. In Lithuania there is no legal definition and legal framework for microcredentials. Nevertheless, there are training offers which are in-line with EC approach to microcredentials (such as, modules of VET programmes, non-formal adult education programmes, non-formal VET programmes, etc.). The initiative is also relevant for higher education institutions, which are increasingly exploring the use of microcredentials, for example in the context of strengthening the social dimension of higher education.

Objectives

Goals and objectives of the policy development.

To develop and enact a model of the microcredentials system that support lifelong learning and enables the recognition of formal, non-formal and independent learning and flexible progression between different levels of education.

Description

What/How/Who/For whom/When of the policy development in detail, explaining its activities and annual progress, main actors and target groups.

To achieve a mutual understanding on the Lithuanian approach to microcredentials, how the system of microcredentials may operate and what are the necessary elements for their quality, efficiency, flexibility, transparency, and recognition, a model for microcredentials system is being developed within the ESF project ‘Development of opportunities for the recognition and assessment of individuals’ acquired competences (PRI (SI) PAŽINK)’ (2025-2029).

The project activities are structured around three main axes, one of which is the development and consolidation of a model of the microcredentials system, including the adaptation of the individual learning accounts system to support microcredentials. Coordinator of the project (PRI (SI) PAŽINK) and of development of the microcredentials system model is Qualifications and VET Development Centre (KPMPC). Centre for Quality Assessment in Higher Education (SKVC) acts as a project partner in developing a higher education component of the microcredentials’ model. The European Social Fund Agency (ESFA) will be responsible for the adaptation of the individual learning accounts system to support microcredentials.

More precisely, the model of the microcredentials system is intended to address the following aspects: definition, volume, identification of levels in line with the Lithuanian Qualifications Framework (LTQF), requirements for providers, quality assurance arrangements,...

To achieve a mutual understanding on the Lithuanian approach to microcredentials, how the system of microcredentials may operate and what are the necessary elements for their quality, efficiency, flexibility, transparency, and recognition, a model for microcredentials system is being developed within the ESF project ‘Development of opportunities for the recognition and assessment of individuals’ acquired competences (PRI (SI) PAŽINK)’ (2025-2029).

The project activities are structured around three main axes, one of which is the development and consolidation of a model of the microcredentials system, including the adaptation of the individual learning accounts system to support microcredentials. Coordinator of the project (PRI (SI) PAŽINK) and of development of the microcredentials system model is Qualifications and VET Development Centre (KPMPC). Centre for Quality Assessment in Higher Education (SKVC) acts as a project partner in developing a higher education component of the microcredentials’ model. The European Social Fund Agency (ESFA) will be responsible for the adaptation of the individual learning accounts system to support microcredentials.

More precisely, the model of the microcredentials system is intended to address the following aspects: definition, volume, identification of levels in line with the Lithuanian Qualifications Framework (LTQF), requirements for providers, quality assurance arrangements, registration, issuance of credentials and/or entries in relevant databases, recognition and stackability, implementation measures, and governance, including institutional responsibilities. The system will cover both the VET and higher education sectors and will also provide for the alignment of the Individual Learning Accounts (ILA) system with microcredentials.

2025
Implementation

In June 2025, groups of experts representing VET and higher education fields began their work. To date, other countries' experiences and studies of international organisations and EU agencies have been analysed to inform this work. The work of VET expert group is coordinated by Qualifications and VET Development Centre, whereas the work of higher education expert group – by the Centre for Quality Assessment in Higher Education. Consultations with the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport and other stakeholders have also been held.

Bodies responsible

This section lists main bodies that are responsible for the implementation of the policy development or for its specific parts or activities, as indicated in the regulatory acts. The responsibilities are usually explained in its description.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Sport
  • Qualifications and VET Development Centre (KPMPC)
  • Centre for Quality Assessment in Higher Education (SKVC)
  • National Education Agency
  • European Social Fund Agency (ESFA)

Target groups

Those who are positively and directly affected by the measures of the policy development; those on the list are specifically defined in the EU VET policy documents. A policy development can be addressed to one or several target groups.

Learners

  • Learners with migrant background, including refugees
  • Learners with disabilities
  • Adult learners
  • Learners from other groups at risk of exclusion (minorities, people with fewer opportunities due to geographical location or social-economic disadvantaged position)

Thematic categories

Thematic categories capture main aspects of the decision-making and operation of national VET and LLL systems. These broad areas represent key elements that all VET and LLL systems have to different extents and in different combinations, and which come into focus depending on the EU and national priorities. Thematic categories are further divided into thematic sub-categories. Based on their description, policy developments can be assigned to one or several thematic categories.

Modernising VET offer and delivery

This thematic category looks at what and how individuals learn, how learning content and learning outcomes in initial and continuing VET are defined, adapted and updated. First and foremost, it examines how VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses are updated and modernised or new ones created. Updated and renewed VET content ensures that learners acquire a balanced mix of competences that address modern demands, and are more closely aligned with the realities of the labour market, including key competences, digital competences and skills for green transition and sustainability, both sector-specific and across sectors. Using learning outcomes as a basis is important to facilitate this modernisation, including modularisation of VET programmes. Updating and developing teaching and learning materials to support the above is also part of the category.

The thematic category continues to focus on strengthening high-quality and inclusive apprenticeships and work-based learning in real-life work environments and in line with the European framework for quality and effective apprenticeships. It looks at expanding apprenticeship to continuing vocational training and at developing VET programmes at EQF levels 5-8 for better permeability and lifelong learning and to support the need for higher vocational skills.

This thematic category also focuses on VET delivery through a mix of open, digital and participative learning environments, including workplaces conducive to learning, which are flexible, more adaptable to the ways individuals learn, and provide more access and outreach to various groups of learners, diversifying modes of learning and exploiting the potential of digital learning solutions and blended learning to complement face-to-face learning.

Centres of vocational excellence that connect VET to innovation and skill ecosystems and facilitate stronger cooperation with business and research also fall into this category.

Using learning-outcome-based approaches and modularisation

The learning-outcomes-based approaches focus on what a learner is expected to know, to be able to do and understand at the end of a learning process (Cedefop, 2016). Learning outcomes can be defined at the system level as in national qualification frameworks (NQFs), most of which are currently based on learning outcomes. Learning outcomes can be defined in qualification standards, curricula, learning programmes and assessment, although the last one is still uncommon. This thematic sub-category refers to the use of learning outcomes in these contexts and to development and use of modules or units of learning outcomes in VET curricula and programmes.

Transparency and portability of VET skills and qualifications

European principles and tools, such as EQF, ESCO, ECTS, Europass and ECVET, provide a strong basis for transparency and portability of national and sectoral qualifications across Europe, including the issuing of digital diplomas and certificates.

This thematic category looks at how individuals are supported in transferring, accumulating, and validating skills and competences acquired in formal, non-formal and informal settings – including learning on the job – and in having their learning recognised towards a qualification at any point of their lives. This is only possible if qualifications are transparent and comparable and are part of comprehensive national qualifications frameworks. Availability of qualifications smaller than full and acquirable in shorter periods of time is necessary; some countries have recently worked on developing partial qualifications, microcredentials, etc.

Developing and applying qualifications smaller/shorter than full

This thematic sub-category refers to the development and implementation of qualifications  that are smaller than full qualifications (alternative credentials) or are acquired in a shorter learning experience. It includes microcredentials, partial qualifications, units of learning outcomes (ECVET principle), digital badges, etc. These are owned by learners and can be combined or not to get a full qualification.

Subsystem

Part of the vocational education and training and lifelong learning systems the policy development applies to.
IVET
CVET

Further reading

Sources for further reading where readers can find more information on policy developments: links to official documents, dedicated websites, project pages. Some sources may only be available in national languages.

Country

Type of development

Policy developments are divided into three types: strategy/action plan; regulation/legislation; and practical measure/initiative.
Practical measure/Initiative
Cite as

Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2026). Development of a model of the microcredentials system: Lithuania. In Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2026). Timeline of VET policies in Europe (2025 update) [Online tool].

https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/50473