Timeline
  • 2021Design
  • 2022Implementation
  • 2023Completed
ID number
44730

Background

A brief overview of the context and rationale of the policy development, explaining why it is implemented or why it is important.

An external evaluation of public schools of higher VET (MIEEK), with favourable results, was conducted in 2015, before the accreditation of the institutes as public schools of higher VET by the Cyprus Agency of Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Higher Education, which took place in 2017. As a result, there is a need to conduct a new external evaluation, in order to determine the quality of the structures and programmes of study offered by MIEEK since their accreditation.

Objectives

Goals and objectives of the policy development.

The external evaluation aims to:

  1. investigate the employability prospects of MIEEK graduates;
  2. investigate the extent of MIEEK graduate satisfaction and use of acquired skills in the labour market and in society in general;
  3. ensure that labour market intelligence is accompanied by a rapid yet effective and flexible learning provision;
  4. assess employers' who employ MIEEK graduate satisfaction by their performance;
  5. assess adequacy of training infrastructure, curricula and pedagogical methods from the student perspective;
  6. upgrade and standardise the process of collecting data and establishing quality indicators at VET school level: success rates in exams, dropout rates, employment rates, degree of satisfaction of students and graduates, and degree of satisfaction of employers;
  7. evaluate quality in designing training activities, the quality of the teaching process and qualifications and overall performance of teachers and trainers.

Description

What/How/Who/For whom/When of the policy development in detail, explaining its activities and annual progress, main actors and target groups.

The contractor, in the context of the implementation of the contract, is expected to examine various factors and, more specifically, to produce:

  1. a study on the relation of study programmes to labour market needs: existing specialisations are to be assessed in terms of their relevance to the labour market. The contractor should also produce an analysis on the employability rates of MIEEK graduates;
  2. an evaluation report on the adequacy of the curriculum (and the overall teaching design) offered by individual VET school units;
  3. an assessment/evaluations study on the quality and adequacy of the facilities/infrastructure existing at VET school unit level;
  4. a report on satisfaction rates of students from a given academic period, examining the degree of satisfaction on matters such as the curriculum, teaching process, fees charged, and school infrastructure (laboratories, equipment, etc);
  5. an assessment/evaluation report on the adequacy of the teaching staff: this was determined with the distribution and completion of a questionnaire and the participation of MIEEK graduates, of the last five years, in a group interview. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analysed;
  6. research on the adequacy of teaching staff according to an assessment by 'active' students, a final/synthesis report containing conclusions; and recommendations for further improving the quality of teaching and learning in MIEEK.

The external evaluation is...

The contractor, in the context of the implementation of the contract, is expected to examine various factors and, more specifically, to produce:

  1. a study on the relation of study programmes to labour market needs: existing specialisations are to be assessed in terms of their relevance to the labour market. The contractor should also produce an analysis on the employability rates of MIEEK graduates;
  2. an evaluation report on the adequacy of the curriculum (and the overall teaching design) offered by individual VET school units;
  3. an assessment/evaluations study on the quality and adequacy of the facilities/infrastructure existing at VET school unit level;
  4. a report on satisfaction rates of students from a given academic period, examining the degree of satisfaction on matters such as the curriculum, teaching process, fees charged, and school infrastructure (laboratories, equipment, etc);
  5. an assessment/evaluation report on the adequacy of the teaching staff: this was determined with the distribution and completion of a questionnaire and the participation of MIEEK graduates, of the last five years, in a group interview. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analysed;
  6. research on the adequacy of teaching staff according to an assessment by 'active' students, a final/synthesis report containing conclusions; and recommendations for further improving the quality of teaching and learning in MIEEK.

The external evaluation is part of the ESF+ project Further development of technical and vocational education and training, and is therefore relevant to other measures, managed by the Department of Secondary Vocational Education and Training (DoSVET) which is responsible for various VET pathways, -included in the project. These include the development and management of an alumni interconnection platform, the purchase of services from instructors for teaching at MIEEK, and the creation of registers which include these qualified instructors.

2021
Design

In 2021, tender documents and technical specifications were prepared.

2022
Implementation

In 2022, a contractor was selected through a call for tenders procedure.

2023
Completed

In the context of the implementation of the contract, the final report on the results of the aforementioned evaluation was delivered. The results of the final report were presented publicly, and actions have already been planned for their further utilisation. The actions that have already been initiated include:

  • the upgrade of laboratory facilities and equipment,
  • the development of flexible learning pathways (e.g., promotion of micro-certifications and online courses),
  • the enhancement of practical training with greater involvement from businesses, and
  • the provision of study programmes during morning hours.

Bodies responsible

This section lists main bodies that are responsible for the implementation of the policy development or for its specific parts or activities, as indicated in the regulatory acts. The responsibilities are usually explained in its description.
  • Ministry of Education, Sport and Youth (MESY)

Target groups

Those who are positively and directly affected by the measures of the policy development; those on the list are specifically defined in the EU VET policy documents. A policy development can be addressed to one or several target groups.

Learners

  • Young people (15-29 years old)
  • Adult learners

Education professionals

  • Teachers
  • Trainers

Entities providing VET

  • Companies
  • VET providers (all kinds)

Thematic categories

Thematic categories capture main aspects of the decision-making and operation of national VET and LLL systems. These broad areas represent key elements that all VET and LLL systems have to different extents and in different combinations, and which come into focus depending on the EU and national priorities. Thematic categories are further divided into thematic sub-categories. Based on their description, policy developments can be assigned to one or several thematic categories.

Governance of VET and lifelong learning

This thematic category looks at existing legal frameworks providing for strategic, operational – including quality assurance – and financing arrangements for VET and lifelong learning (LLL). It examines how VET and LLL-related policies are placed in broad national socioeconomic contexts and coordinate with other strategies and policies, such as economic, social and employment, growth and innovation, recovery and resilience.

This thematic category covers partnerships and collaboration networks of VET stakeholders – especially the social partners – to shape and implement VET in a country, including looking at how their roles and responsibilities for VET at national, regional and local levels are shared and distributed, ensuring an appropriate degree of autonomy for VET providers to adapt their offer.

The thematic category also includes efforts to create national, regional and sectoral skills intelligence systems (skills anticipation and graduate tracking) and using skills intelligence for making decisions about VET and LLL on quality, inclusiveness and flexibility.

Engaging VET stakeholders and strengthening partnerships in VET

This thematic sub-category refers both to formal mechanisms of stakeholder engagement in VET governance and to informal cooperation among stakeholders, which motivate shared responsibility for quality VET. Formal engagement is usually based on legally established institutional procedures that clearly define the role and responsibilities for relevant stakeholders in designing, implementing and improving VET. It also refers to establishing and increasing the degree of autonomy of VET providers for agile and flexible VET provision.

In terms of informal cooperation, the sub-category covers targeted actions by different stakeholders to promote or implement VET. This cooperation often leads to creating sustainable partnerships and making commitments for targeted actions, in line with the national context and regulation, e.g. national alliances for apprenticeships, pacts for youth or partnerships between schools and employers. It can also include initiatives and projects run by the social partners or sectoral organisations or networks of voluntary experts and executives, retired or on sabbatical, to support their peers in the fields of VET and apprenticeships, as part of the EAfA.

Further developing national quality assurance systems

This thematic sub-category refers to further development of national quality assurance (QA) systems for IVET and CVET, for all learning environments (school-based provision and work-based learning, including apprenticeships) and all learning types (digital, face-to-face or blended), delivered by both public and private providers. These systems are underpinned by the EQAVET quality criteria and by indicative descriptors applied both at system and provider levels, as defined in Annex II of the VET Recommendation. The sub-category concerns creating and improving external and self-evaluation of VET providers, and establishing criteria of QA, accreditation of providers and programmes. It also covers the activities of Quality assurance national reference points for VET on implementing and further developing the EQAVET framework, including the implementation of peer reviews at VET system level.

Modernising VET offer and delivery

This thematic category looks at what and how individuals learn, how learning content and learning outcomes in initial and continuing VET are defined, adapted and updated. First and foremost, it examines how VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses are updated and modernised or new ones created. Updated and renewed VET content ensures that learners acquire a balanced mix of competences that address modern demands, and are more closely aligned with the realities of the labour market, including key competences, digital competences and skills for green transition and sustainability, both sector-specific and across sectors. Using learning outcomes as a basis is important to facilitate this modernisation, including modularisation of VET programmes. Updating and developing teaching and learning materials to support the above is also part of the category.

The thematic category continues to focus on strengthening high-quality and inclusive apprenticeships and work-based learning in real-life work environments and in line with the European framework for quality and effective apprenticeships. It looks at expanding apprenticeship to continuing vocational training and at developing VET programmes at EQF levels 5-8 for better permeability and lifelong learning and to support the need for higher vocational skills.

This thematic category also focuses on VET delivery through a mix of open, digital and participative learning environments, including workplaces conducive to learning, which are flexible, more adaptable to the ways individuals learn, and provide more access and outreach to various groups of learners, diversifying modes of learning and exploiting the potential of digital learning solutions and blended learning to complement face-to-face learning.

Centres of vocational excellence that connect VET to innovation and skill ecosystems and facilitate stronger cooperation with business and research also fall into this category.

Modernising VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses

VET standards and curricula define the content and outcomes of learning, most often at national or sectoral levels. VET programmes are based on standards and curricula and refer to specific vocations/occupations. They all need to be regularly reviewed, updated and aligned with the needs of the labour market and society. They need to include a balanced mix of vocational and technical skills corresponding to economic cycles, evolving jobs and working methods, and key competences, providing for resilience, lifelong learning, employability, social inclusion, active citizenship, sustainable awareness and personal development (Council of the European Union, 2020). The thematic sub-category also refers to establishing new VET programmes, reducing their number or discontinuing some. It also includes design of CVET programmes and training courses to adapt to labour market, sectoral or individual up- and re-skilling needs.

European priorities in VET

EU priorities in VET and LLL are set in the Council Recommendation for VET for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience, adopted on 24 November 2020 and in the Osnabrück Declaration on VET endorsed on 30 November 2020.

VET Recommendation

  • VET underpinned by a culture of quality assurance

Osnabrück Declaration

  • Resilience and excellence through quality, inclusive and flexible VET

Subsystem

Part of the vocational education and training and lifelong learning systems the policy development applies to.
CVET

Further reading

Sources for further reading where readers can find more information on policy developments: links to official documents, dedicated websites, project pages. Some sources may only be available in national languages.

Country

Type of development

Policy developments are divided into three types: strategy/action plan; regulation/legislation; and practical measure/initiative.
Practical measure/Initiative
Cite as

Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). External evaluation of the Public School of Higher Vocational Education and Training (MIEEK): Cyprus. In Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Timeline of VET policies in Europe (2024 update) [Online tool].

https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/sl/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/44730