Timeline
  • 2018Pilot
  • 2019Implementation
  • 2020Implementation
  • 2021Implementation
  • 2022Implementation
  • 2023Implementation
  • 2024Implementation
ID number
28050

Description

What/How/Who/For whom/When of the policy development in detail, explaining its activities and annual progress, main actors and target groups.

In March 2018, as part of the 2015 Pre-school and School Education act, a National Education Inspectorate (NEI) was established; the mission of the Inspectorate is to:

  1. develop, refine and approve inspection criteria and indicators;
  2. organise and conduct inspection of kindergartens and schools;
  3. draw up estimates and guidelines;
  4. provide the education minister and the Council of Ministers with an analysis of the quality of education in the inspected kindergartens and schools for specified periods and areas.

One important feature of the inspection framework (involving five-yearly inspection cycles of all kindergartens and schools) is that it has been designed to be part of the quality evaluation system that should provide for the enforcement of performance-based funding in pre-school and school education. According to the Pre-school and School Education Act (PSEA, 2016), the resources for the development of kindergartens, schools and personality development support centres shall include earmarked funding for improvement of the quality of instruction (Art. 284 (1)). The school inspections results shall provide a basis for quality assessment and for distribution of these funds across kindergartens and schools.

2018
Pilot

The NEI started its work in March 2018 and developed a framework for inspection with a set of criteria and indicators for monitoring the quality of both VET and general education institutions. The indicators covered two major areas:

  1. the education process (27 indicators reflecting the effectiveness of interaction in the learning process; the effectiveness of the activities for the personal development of students; monitoring the progress of students, the evaluation of learning outcomes and the effectiveness of socialisation; coverage, inclusion and prevention of dropping out; satisfaction with the education process);
  2. institutional governance (24 indicators reflecting the sustainable development of the school; the effectiveness of resource management; the quality of the physical environment; the development of school culture; the development of partnerships; the degree of satisfaction with the school management.

In 2018/19, the piloting of the criteria, indicators and procedures for school inspections started in 80 schools throughout the country, including VET schools.

2019
Implementation

In 2019, the piloting phase of the inspection framework was completed. The piloting results were used for validating and improving the indicators and the evaluation scale, as well as for upgrading the electronic management system. The first group of external school inspectors was trained and a database with external evaluation was launched. The implementation phase involving the first group of school inspections started during the academic year 2019/20 (the actual timeframe that inspections were carried out was from September to December 2019 and from January to June 2020 however no data on the exact time period that the inspections took place exist). In the academic year 2019/20 only 48 schools were inspected, of which nine were VET schools.

2020
Implementation

The process of school inspections was negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 35 schools were inspected in the period October-December 2020, of which seven were VET schools, three general secondary schools with VET classes, and two united schools providing VET.

2021
Implementation

During the 2020/21 academic year 49 schools providing VET (including dual training) were inspected.

In September 2021, the education minister issued Ordinance No 18 on the inspection of kindergartens and schools, which established the State education standard (SES) on the inspection of kindergartens and schools. The SES defined inspection as a process of comprehensive, independent expert assessment of the quality of provision of the kindergarten or school education at a particular point in time and determines the guidelines for improvement set out by NEI.

Three areas for inspection were defined within the SES:

a.the education process, including learning outcomes. In this area, the following aspects are inspected:

i.the effectiveness of teaching-learning interaction and the application of the competence approach;

ii.classroom and learner management;

iii.learner assessment;

iv.the support provided for personal development and the teamwork between teachers and other pedagogical specialists for achieving the best results for each of their learners.

b. institutional management, including human resource management (HR), management of the effectiveness of qualifications and the appraisal of teaching staff. In this area, the following aspects are monitored:

i.management of financial information and technological resources;

ii.management of partnerships for the development of the kindergarten or school for improving education outcomes;

iii.leadership effectiveness.

c. institutional environment, including the physical environment and the information and library resources of schools and kindergartens). In this area, the following aspects are monitored:

i.development of the organisational culture of the kindergarten or school;

ii.development of a supportive environment and effective interaction between all those involved in the education process and with all stakeholders;

iii.satisfaction of the participants.

A clause in the ordinance states that for each inspection area, the approval of the NEI director is required. The approval must be based on inspection criteria and indicators. According to the ordinance, by 31 August each year the NEI publishes on its website the criteria and indicators against which inspections are to be carried out in the forthcoming academic year.

The SES also established the inspection phases and procedures, as well as the quality evaluation scoring to be applied. The quality assessment involves the assignment of scores for each of the defined indicators. The evaluation for each criterion is formed as the sum of the scores for all indicators related to this criterion. The overall rating of each individual inspection area is formed as a percentage ratio of the sum of the scores obtained on the individual criteria to the maximum number of points for the area. The scores calculated this way are subsequently converted into a qualitative score, as follows: very good - higher than 81 per cent; good - from 61 to 80 per cent; satisfactory - from 41 to 60 per cent; unsatisfactory- lower than 40 per cent.

2022
Implementation

The NEI continued to implement school inspections according to the annual plan of the institutions inspected, and semi-annual inspection plans. In 2022, the total number of inspected institutions (kindergartens and schools) was 148.

2023
Implementation

In 2023, the National Education Inspectorate (NEI) continued carrying out school inspections in line with their annual and semi-annual inspection plans. For the 2023/24 academic year, a total of 63 educational institutions were inspected, including both kindergartens and schools. Only 3 VET schools were among those inspected.

2024
Implementation

In 2024, the NEI published a revised version of its Quality framework, marking a continuation of the organisation's commitment to quality assessment in education. This revision builds upon the 2022 publication while ensuring alignment with current operational needs. The revised publication primarily focused on maintaining the document's relevance through technical updates, particularly in the areas of links, references, and instruction manuals to reflect the requirements of the 2024/25 academic year. The revision preserved the foundation laid in the 2022 version, retaining the same core principles, mission, vision, objectives, inspection areas, and methodological approaches.

Bodies responsible

This section lists main bodies that are responsible for the implementation of the policy development or for its specific parts or activities, as indicated in the regulatory acts. The responsibilities are usually explained in its description.
  • National Education Inspectorate (NEI)

Target groups

Those who are positively and directly affected by the measures of the policy development; those on the list are specifically defined in the EU VET policy documents. A policy development can be addressed to one or several target groups.

Learners

  • Learners in upper secondary, including apprentices

Education professionals

  • Teachers
  • School leaders

Entities providing VET

  • VET providers (all kinds)

Thematic categories

Thematic categories capture main aspects of the decision-making and operation of national VET and LLL systems. These broad areas represent key elements that all VET and LLL systems have to different extents and in different combinations, and which come into focus depending on the EU and national priorities. Thematic categories are further divided into thematic sub-categories. Based on their description, policy developments can be assigned to one or several thematic categories.

Governance of VET and lifelong learning

This thematic category looks at existing legal frameworks providing for strategic, operational – including quality assurance – and financing arrangements for VET and lifelong learning (LLL). It examines how VET and LLL-related policies are placed in broad national socioeconomic contexts and coordinate with other strategies and policies, such as economic, social and employment, growth and innovation, recovery and resilience.

This thematic category covers partnerships and collaboration networks of VET stakeholders – especially the social partners – to shape and implement VET in a country, including looking at how their roles and responsibilities for VET at national, regional and local levels are shared and distributed, ensuring an appropriate degree of autonomy for VET providers to adapt their offer.

The thematic category also includes efforts to create national, regional and sectoral skills intelligence systems (skills anticipation and graduate tracking) and using skills intelligence for making decisions about VET and LLL on quality, inclusiveness and flexibility.

Further developing national quality assurance systems

This thematic sub-category refers to further development of national quality assurance (QA) systems for IVET and CVET, for all learning environments (school-based provision and work-based learning, including apprenticeships) and all learning types (digital, face-to-face or blended), delivered by both public and private providers. These systems are underpinned by the EQAVET quality criteria and by indicative descriptors applied both at system and provider levels, as defined in Annex II of the VET Recommendation. The sub-category concerns creating and improving external and self-evaluation of VET providers, and establishing criteria of QA, accreditation of providers and programmes. It also covers the activities of Quality assurance national reference points for VET on implementing and further developing the EQAVET framework, including the implementation of peer reviews at VET system level.

Subsystem

Part of the vocational education and training and lifelong learning systems the policy development applies to.
IVET

Country

Type of development

Policy developments are divided into three types: strategy/action plan; regulation/legislation; and practical measure/initiative.
Regulation/Legislation
Cite as

Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Inspection framework for VET schools: Bulgaria. In Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Timeline of VET policies in Europe (2024 update) [Online tool].

https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/it/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/28050