Timeline
  • 2021Approved/Agreed
  • 2022Implementation
ID number
41819

Background

A brief overview of the context and rationale of the policy development, explaining why it is implemented or why it is important.

The demands on continuing education programmes at higher education institutions have become more comprehensive in recent years. This has partly to do with the target groups, which have become more heterogeneous due to different educational backgrounds and life realities. The need to create credit opportunities for previously acquired knowledge and skills (also non-formally or informally acquired) has become stronger in recent years, as has the interest in vocational and labour market-related continuing education. This has also led to discussions about the structure of higher education CET programmes and the possible establishing new formats (e.g. short cycle programmes, microcredentials, etc.).

The range of continuing education programmes offered by higher education institutions has grown considerably in recent years, but at the same time it has become less transparent, more confusing and difficult for interested parties to keep track of. In addition, quality assurance has been neglected in some cases.

Due to different legal bases, the framework conditions for attending CET programmes are defined differently in the individual higher education sectors (universities, university colleges of teacher education, universities of applied sciences, private universities). The degrees are also regulated inconsistently, which has led to a great diversity of titles.

Objectives

Goals and objectives of the policy development.

The goal of the reform of continuing education at higher education (HE) institutions, anchored in the programme of the current government, is to improve the framework conditions for CET programmes in order to strengthen their quality, transparency and international reputation.

In the decision of the Council of Ministers of 21 April 2021, which gave the go-ahead for the implementation of this reform, several objectives are associated with this project:

  1. standardisation of the (legal) framework conditions for CET in the Austrian higher education sector;
  2. legal anchoring of a new 'continuing education bachelor' study format;
  3. establishment of two HE CET programmes: academic or artistic higher education continuing education: Bachelor of continuing education or Master of continuing education, as well as professionally oriented continuing education: BA Professional or MA Professional;
  4. promotion of cooperation with non-university legal entities: creation of study programmes that are designed by the universities as continuing education studies and carried out together with professionally oriented CET institutions outside the HE sector;
  5. quality assurance through uniform standards and external review options: the aim is to develop an overall quality-assuring and cross-sectoral framework that allows higher education institutions individual flexibility.

Description

What/How/Who/For whom/When of the policy development in detail, explaining its activities and annual progress, main actors and target groups.

In order to implement this reform, the higher education law was amended. The so-called higher education legislation package came into force on 1 October 2021.

The central actor in this reform is the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF). The four types of HE institutions (universities and university colleges of teacher education, universities of applied sciences and private universities) are also involved. Those interested in continuing education at HE institutions should benefit significantly.

The most important changes to continuing education in higher education, anchored in the legislative package, are:

  1. equal regulations for CET courses at all four institutions of the HE sector. All sectors should have the same legal framework for CET courses with regard to access, validation of prior learning and professional experience, academic degrees, and quality assurance;
  2. introduction of the bachelor degree for CET courses and, as a consequence, the alignment of continuing education studies with the Bologna structure (bachelor-master-doctoral degree). This means that a CET master programme can only be taken after completion of a CET bachelor programme. Graduates of CET master programmes can continue with doctoral or PhD studies. This was previously denied to graduates of these programmes;
  3. reduction in the diversity of titles: currently, more than 60 different titles are awarded in higher education. In...

In order to implement this reform, the higher education law was amended. The so-called higher education legislation package came into force on 1 October 2021.

The central actor in this reform is the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF). The four types of HE institutions (universities and university colleges of teacher education, universities of applied sciences and private universities) are also involved. Those interested in continuing education at HE institutions should benefit significantly.

The most important changes to continuing education in higher education, anchored in the legislative package, are:

  1. equal regulations for CET courses at all four institutions of the HE sector. All sectors should have the same legal framework for CET courses with regard to access, validation of prior learning and professional experience, academic degrees, and quality assurance;
  2. introduction of the bachelor degree for CET courses and, as a consequence, the alignment of continuing education studies with the Bologna structure (bachelor-master-doctoral degree). This means that a CET master programme can only be taken after completion of a CET bachelor programme. Graduates of CET master programmes can continue with doctoral or PhD studies. This was previously denied to graduates of these programmes;
  3. reduction in the diversity of titles: currently, more than 60 different titles are awarded in higher education. In the future, courses in the field of general continuing education should conclude with a Bachelor of arts (continuing education), abbreviated to BA (CE) or a Bachelor of science (continuing education), abbreviated to BSc (CE), or the Master of arts (continuing education), abbreviated to MA (CE), or the Master of science (continuing education), abbreviated to MSc (CE). The degrees in professional higher education are Bachelor professional (BPr) or Master professional (MPr). The professional higher education courses are offered in cooperation with non-university education institutions, tailored to the respective occupation-specific specialisation;
  4. inclusion of university-based CET in the existing, internal quality assurance systems of higher education institutions. The Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research can initiate a quality review procedure (carried out by AQ Austria). If deficiencies are found in the CET provision, the higher education institution must fulfil corresponding requirements. In the case of irremediable deficiencies or non-compliance with the requirements, no new students may be admitted to the programme in question.
2021
Approved/Agreed

On 1 October 2021, the higher education legislation package came into force, which legally regulated the reform of continuing education at higher education institutions.

2022
Implementation

In 2022, the HE institutions began to redesign their existing CET programmes in accordance with the changed legal basis. In addition, the development of new programmes has begun, especially those leading to a BA degree (CE and Prof). The University of Continuing Education Krems, Austria's only university offering exclusively HE-based continuing education, has also started to adapt its study programmes. 

Bodies responsible

This section lists main bodies that are responsible for the implementation of the policy development or for its specific parts or activities, as indicated in the regulatory acts. The responsibilities are usually explained in its description.
  • Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF)

Target groups

Those who are positively and directly affected by the measures of the policy development; those on the list are specifically defined in the EU VET policy documents. A policy development can be addressed to one or several target groups.

Learners

  • Young people (15-29 years old)
  • Adult learners

Entities providing VET

  • VET providers (all kinds)

Other

Higher VET providers

Thematic categories

Thematic categories capture main aspects of the decision-making and operation of national VET and LLL systems. These broad areas represent key elements that all VET and LLL systems have to different extents and in different combinations, and which come into focus depending on the EU and national priorities. Thematic categories are further divided into thematic sub-categories. Based on their description, policy developments can be assigned to one or several thematic categories.

Governance of VET and lifelong learning

This thematic category looks at existing legal frameworks providing for strategic, operational – including quality assurance – and financing arrangements for VET and lifelong learning (LLL). It examines how VET and LLL-related policies are placed in broad national socioeconomic contexts and coordinate with other strategies and policies, such as economic, social and employment, growth and innovation, recovery and resilience.

This thematic category covers partnerships and collaboration networks of VET stakeholders – especially the social partners – to shape and implement VET in a country, including looking at how their roles and responsibilities for VET at national, regional and local levels are shared and distributed, ensuring an appropriate degree of autonomy for VET providers to adapt their offer.

The thematic category also includes efforts to create national, regional and sectoral skills intelligence systems (skills anticipation and graduate tracking) and using skills intelligence for making decisions about VET and LLL on quality, inclusiveness and flexibility.

Engaging VET stakeholders and strengthening partnerships in VET

This thematic sub-category refers both to formal mechanisms of stakeholder engagement in VET governance and to informal cooperation among stakeholders, which motivate shared responsibility for quality VET. Formal engagement is usually based on legally established institutional procedures that clearly define the role and responsibilities for relevant stakeholders in designing, implementing and improving VET. It also refers to establishing and increasing the degree of autonomy of VET providers for agile and flexible VET provision.

In terms of informal cooperation, the sub-category covers targeted actions by different stakeholders to promote or implement VET. This cooperation often leads to creating sustainable partnerships and making commitments for targeted actions, in line with the national context and regulation, e.g. national alliances for apprenticeships, pacts for youth or partnerships between schools and employers. It can also include initiatives and projects run by the social partners or sectoral organisations or networks of voluntary experts and executives, retired or on sabbatical, to support their peers in the fields of VET and apprenticeships, as part of the EAfA.

Modernising VET offer and delivery

This thematic category looks at what and how individuals learn, how learning content and learning outcomes in initial and continuing VET are defined, adapted and updated. First and foremost, it examines how VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses are updated and modernised or new ones created. Updated and renewed VET content ensures that learners acquire a balanced mix of competences that address modern demands, and are more closely aligned with the realities of the labour market, including key competences, digital competences and skills for green transition and sustainability, both sector-specific and across sectors. Using learning outcomes as a basis is important to facilitate this modernisation, including modularisation of VET programmes. Updating and developing teaching and learning materials to support the above is also part of the category.

The thematic category continues to focus on strengthening high-quality and inclusive apprenticeships and work-based learning in real-life work environments and in line with the European framework for quality and effective apprenticeships. It looks at expanding apprenticeship to continuing vocational training and at developing VET programmes at EQF levels 5-8 for better permeability and lifelong learning and to support the need for higher vocational skills.

This thematic category also focuses on VET delivery through a mix of open, digital and participative learning environments, including workplaces conducive to learning, which are flexible, more adaptable to the ways individuals learn, and provide more access and outreach to various groups of learners, diversifying modes of learning and exploiting the potential of digital learning solutions and blended learning to complement face-to-face learning.

Centres of vocational excellence that connect VET to innovation and skill ecosystems and facilitate stronger cooperation with business and research also fall into this category.

Modernising VET standards, curricula, programmes and training courses

VET standards and curricula define the content and outcomes of learning, most often at national or sectoral levels. VET programmes are based on standards and curricula and refer to specific vocations/occupations. They all need to be regularly reviewed, updated and aligned with the needs of the labour market and society. They need to include a balanced mix of vocational and technical skills corresponding to economic cycles, evolving jobs and working methods, and key competences, providing for resilience, lifelong learning, employability, social inclusion, active citizenship, sustainable awareness and personal development (Council of the European Union, 2020). The thematic sub-category also refers to establishing new VET programmes, reducing their number or discontinuing some. It also includes design of CVET programmes and training courses to adapt to labour market, sectoral or individual up- and re-skilling needs.

Transparency and portability of VET skills and qualifications

European principles and tools, such as EQF, ESCO, ECTS, Europass and ECVET, provide a strong basis for transparency and portability of national and sectoral qualifications across Europe, including the issuing of digital diplomas and certificates.

This thematic category looks at how individuals are supported in transferring, accumulating, and validating skills and competences acquired in formal, non-formal and informal settings – including learning on the job – and in having their learning recognised towards a qualification at any point of their lives. This is only possible if qualifications are transparent and comparable and are part of comprehensive national qualifications frameworks. Availability of qualifications smaller than full and acquirable in shorter periods of time is necessary; some countries have recently worked on developing partial qualifications, microcredentials, etc.

Developing and applying qualifications smaller/shorter than full

This thematic sub-category refers to the development and implementation of qualifications  that are smaller than full qualifications (alternative credentials) or are acquired in a shorter learning experience. It includes microcredentials, partial qualifications, units of learning outcomes (ECVET principle), digital badges, etc. These are owned by learners and can be combined or not to get a full qualification.

Subsystem

Part of the vocational education and training and lifelong learning systems the policy development applies to.
CVET

Further reading

Sources for further reading where readers can find more information on policy developments: links to official documents, dedicated websites, project pages. Some sources may only be available in national languages.

Country

Type of development

Policy developments are divided into three types: strategy/action plan; regulation/legislation; and practical measure/initiative.
Regulation/Legislation
Cite as
Cedefop and Refernet (2023). Reform of continuing education at higher education institutions: Austria. Timeline of VET policies in Europe. [online tool] https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/41819