Timeline
  • 2021Design
  • 2022Implementation
  • 2023Implementation
  • 2024Implementation
ID number
28438

Background

A brief overview of the context and rationale of the policy development, explaining why it is implemented or why it is important.

The Inspectorate of Education, which monitors school quality and compliance with central rules and regulations, developed an inspection framework in close collaboration with stakeholders. This framework has been in place since August 2017. In addition to its supervisory role, the inspectorate will have a more supporting role, assisting VET providers to improve education and training quality.

Description

What/How/Who/For whom/When of the policy development in detail, explaining its activities and annual progress, main actors and target groups.

In a 2020 letter to parliament, the education ministry announced that a new inspection framework (2021-25) will be developed. The inspectorate will further implement the principle of proportionate supervision; supervision and its intensity will depend on the quality delivered. Schools are expected to jointly develop and commit to more ambitious benchmark values. CINOP, the EQAVET national reference point, and the Quality network of upper secondary VET schools (kwaliteitsnetwerk mbo) will further stimulate peer reviews and other learning activities between VET schools and between teacher teams.

2021
Design

The development of the new inspection framework (2021-25) started in 2021. Making agreements about a more ambitious implementation of the elements of quality assurance is one of the improvement actions that have been initiated for the development of the new inspection framework. By constructing the framework with various stakeholders in vocational education, agreements can be made about what schools need considering quality assurance to claim educational monitoring. The second improvement action concerns the stimulation of peer reviews and other learning activities. This also includes encouraging greater student involvement in quality assurance.

2022
Implementation

The new inspection framework has been used since 2021, and was updated in 2022. In the updated version of the framework the verdict 'zeer zwak' (very poor) is added, as addition to the verdicts 'onvoldoende' (insufficient), 'voldoende' (sufficient) and 'goed' (good). Schools rated 'zeer zwak' risk losing their right of funding and their right of awarding official diplomas. In a policy letter, the education ministry consulted the parliament about this updated version and informed them that the inspection intends to shorten the process of observing problems and resolving them, in order to make sure the quality of education is quickly brought up to the standards. The ways in which the inspection intends to do this are still under discussion.

2023
Implementation

In the yearly update of the inspection framework, basic skills - including Dutch language, arithmetic, and citizenship - have been added. As a result, the inspectorate will now also monitor the extent to which a VET institution's basic skills education prepares students for further education, the labour market, and society.

2024
Implementation

The most significant change in the yearly update of the inspection framework is the introduction of random quality inspections at VET institutions. These inspections aim to periodically provide a representative picture of the quality of education in VET schools.

Bodies responsible

This section lists main bodies that are responsible for the implementation of the policy development or for its specific parts or activities, as indicated in the regulatory acts. The responsibilities are usually explained in its description.
  • Inspectorate of Education
  • CINOP (EQAVET national reference point)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture and Science

Target groups

Those who are positively and directly affected by the measures of the policy development; those on the list are specifically defined in the EU VET policy documents. A policy development can be addressed to one or several target groups.

Education professionals

  • Teachers
  • School leaders

Entities providing VET

  • VET providers (all kinds)

Thematic categories

Thematic categories capture main aspects of the decision-making and operation of national VET and LLL systems. These broad areas represent key elements that all VET and LLL systems have to different extents and in different combinations, and which come into focus depending on the EU and national priorities. Thematic categories are further divided into thematic sub-categories. Based on their description, policy developments can be assigned to one or several thematic categories.

Governance of VET and lifelong learning

This thematic category looks at existing legal frameworks providing for strategic, operational – including quality assurance – and financing arrangements for VET and lifelong learning (LLL). It examines how VET and LLL-related policies are placed in broad national socioeconomic contexts and coordinate with other strategies and policies, such as economic, social and employment, growth and innovation, recovery and resilience.

This thematic category covers partnerships and collaboration networks of VET stakeholders – especially the social partners – to shape and implement VET in a country, including looking at how their roles and responsibilities for VET at national, regional and local levels are shared and distributed, ensuring an appropriate degree of autonomy for VET providers to adapt their offer.

The thematic category also includes efforts to create national, regional and sectoral skills intelligence systems (skills anticipation and graduate tracking) and using skills intelligence for making decisions about VET and LLL on quality, inclusiveness and flexibility.

Further developing national quality assurance systems

This thematic sub-category refers to further development of national quality assurance (QA) systems for IVET and CVET, for all learning environments (school-based provision and work-based learning, including apprenticeships) and all learning types (digital, face-to-face or blended), delivered by both public and private providers. These systems are underpinned by the EQAVET quality criteria and by indicative descriptors applied both at system and provider levels, as defined in Annex II of the VET Recommendation. The sub-category concerns creating and improving external and self-evaluation of VET providers, and establishing criteria of QA, accreditation of providers and programmes. It also covers the activities of Quality assurance national reference points for VET on implementing and further developing the EQAVET framework, including the implementation of peer reviews at VET system level.

Subsystem

Part of the vocational education and training and lifelong learning systems the policy development applies to.
IVET
CVET

Further reading

Sources for further reading where readers can find more information on policy developments: links to official documents, dedicated websites, project pages. Some sources may only be available in national languages.

Country

Type of development

Policy developments are divided into three types: strategy/action plan; regulation/legislation; and practical measure/initiative.
Regulation/Legislation
Cite as

Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Inspection framework: Netherlands. In Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Timeline of VET policies in Europe (2024 update) [Online tool].

https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/28438