Skip to main content Skip to language switcher
Home
CEDEFOP
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

View more online tools

Increase font size

Decrease-font-size

Financing adult learning database Topbar

Skip to Content
  • Introduction
  • Overview
  • Types of financing instruments
  • Compare instruments
  • Map
  • Advanced Search
  • Scope and glossary
Login
Register

Financing adult learning database

Financing adult learning database

  • Introduction
  • Overview
  • Types of financing instruments
  • Compare instruments
  • Map
  • Advanced Search
  • Scope and glossary

Training fund in scaffolding sector

PDF Version
Name of the instrument - Local language
Weiterbildungsfonds der Gerüstbauer
Name of the instrument - English translation
Training fund in scaffolding sector
Country
Germany
Type of instrument
Training fund
Type of entry
Single instrument
Short description

As in a few other sectors, companies in the scaffolding sector are obliged by law to contribute a specific percentage of the payroll to a training fund which covers among others (e.g. social security payments) training costs. In return, companies may receive grants for compensating their training costs.

Short description of the related instruments

nap

Level of operation
Sectoral
Name of a part of the country
nap
Name of the region (for regional instruments)
nap
Name of the sector (for sectoral instruments)
Scaffolding sector
Legal basis

§ 4 Abs. 2 Tarifvertragsgesetz
§ 4 paragr. 2 act on labour agreement

Objective(s) and target(s)

To increase traning in scaffoding sector. The specific conditions of the scaffolding work requires a high quality training in this field.

Year of implementation
1981
Year of latest amendment
2002
Operation/Management

The operational management is conducted by the training fund.

Eligible group(s)

Employees of the scaffolding sector

Group(s) with preferential treatment

None

Education and training eligible

Certified scaffolding group leader, preparation course trainer ability, preparation course trade test in scaffolding for long-term scaffolding workers, training for scaffolder

Source of financing and collection mechanism

Levy on companies.
Each employer in the sector pays 24.2% of the total gross wages of all industrial workers of the company to the fund which cover among others (social security costs) training costs; 2.5% of the payroll levy are earmarked for intial and further education.

Financing formula and allocation mechanisms

The fund covers 100% of the course fees; there is a fixed amount per day for the personnel absence costs (up to 100% of the daily wage costs for certain courses).

Allocation: Employers are reimbursed wage costs (employer's right to claim reimbursement expires at the end of the second calendar year following the year in which training costs incurred (§ 29 TV VET)). Reimbursement of fees costs goes directly to training providers (most cases).

Eligible costs

Fees and other costs related to education and training

Frequency of the use

Each year

Volumes of funding

In 2010, EUR 8.75 million were spent on initial and further education. This amount included EUR 1 760 000 for further education of qualified staff.

Beneficiaries/take up

In 2012, 462 companies were funded. In the period from 1982 to 2014 an overall number of 14 769 benefited from the fund.

Organisation responsible for monitoring/evaluation

Social Security Fund in the scaffolding industry.

Monitoring/evaluation reports available

na

Most relevant webpage - in English

na

Most relevant webpage - local language

https://www.sokageruest.de/soka

Sources

Gerhard Bosch (2010) In Qualifi zierung investieren – ein Weiterbildungsfonds für Deutschland. Expertise im Auftrag des Gesprächskreises Arbeit und Qualifi zierung der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Bonn (Online: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/07668.pdf)

Gerhard Bosch (2012) Weiterbildungsfonds – ein Finanzierungsmodell auch für Deutschland? IN: BIBB BWP 1/2012, p. 23ff

Reinhard Bahnmüller (2014) Tarifvertragliche Weiterbildungsregulierung in Deutschland. Formen, Effekte und Perspektiven für eine überbetriebliche Regulierung. BIBB Fachtagung „Sozialpartnerschaftliches Handeln in der betrieblichen Weiterbildung“ am 3./4.April 2014 in Bonn

BERGER, K.; MORAAL, D.; HÄUSELE, S. (2012): Tarifvertraglich geregelte Finanzierung der beruflichen Weiterbildung am Beispiel der Sozialkasse im Gerüstbaugewerbe. In: Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis 41 (2), S. 49-53

© 2022 CEDEFOP
EU An Agency of the European Union
  • Sitemap
  • FAQs
  • Cookies policy
  • Privacy statement
  • Data protection
  • Access to documents
  • Legal notice
Designed & developed by EWORX S.A.