Timeline
  • 2017Design
  • 2018Design
  • 2019Design
  • 2020Design
  • 2021Design
  • 2022Completed
ID number
29040

Background

A brief overview of the context and rationale of the policy development, explaining why it is implemented or why it is important.

In 2017, the government appointed an expert committee (the Stoltenberg Committee). The purpose of the committee wasto build a nuanced and balanced knowledge base on why gender differences occur in school performance.

Objectives

Goals and objectives of the policy development.

The objective is to identify the causes of gender differences and propose effective measures to reduce them.

Description

What/How/Who/For whom/When of the policy development in detail, explaining its activities and annual progress, main actors and target groups.

The tasks of the committee were:

  1. to review relevant systematic knowledge overviews, as well as other relevant national and international research on gender differences in school performance;
  2. to systematise existing knowledge and related it to the context of today's Norwegian school system to arrive at a common knowledge base about the challenges;
  3. to investigate whether there are conditions in Norwegian schools or education, or in society at large, that systematically contribute to gender differences in school performance;
  4. to investigate whether gender differences in school performance produce different impacts in different groups of the population, including, for example, students with specific special education needs and students with minority backgrounds;
  5. to investigate the consequences of gender differences in school performance for participation in higher education;
  6. to propose measures at both national and local levels, based on the knowledge base;
  7. to propose pilots that may qualify for systematic testing through impact studies, based on the knowledge base.

The committee arranged several information collection rounds in 2018. On 12 October 2018, the OECD and NIFU published reports on gender differences in school performance on behalf of the Stoltenberg Committee.

In 2019, the committee proposed a total of 64 measures in the following areas:

  1. knowledge system for kindergarten and lower and upper secondary education;
  2. early and...

The tasks of the committee were:

  1. to review relevant systematic knowledge overviews, as well as other relevant national and international research on gender differences in school performance;
  2. to systematise existing knowledge and related it to the context of today's Norwegian school system to arrive at a common knowledge base about the challenges;
  3. to investigate whether there are conditions in Norwegian schools or education, or in society at large, that systematically contribute to gender differences in school performance;
  4. to investigate whether gender differences in school performance produce different impacts in different groups of the population, including, for example, students with specific special education needs and students with minority backgrounds;
  5. to investigate the consequences of gender differences in school performance for participation in higher education;
  6. to propose measures at both national and local levels, based on the knowledge base;
  7. to propose pilots that may qualify for systematic testing through impact studies, based on the knowledge base.

The committee arranged several information collection rounds in 2018. On 12 October 2018, the OECD and NIFU published reports on gender differences in school performance on behalf of the Stoltenberg Committee.

In 2019, the committee proposed a total of 64 measures in the following areas:

  1. knowledge system for kindergarten and lower and upper secondary education;
  2. early and adapted efforts;
  3. organisation and school content in lower and upper secondary education;
  4. transitions in education.
2017
Design
2018
Design
2019
Design

The committee published a Norwegian official report (NOU) on the topic on 4 February 2019 and proposed a number of measures to influence gender distribution in the vocational field.

2020
Design

No new developments took place in 2020.

2021
Design

Some measures were approved, such as the right to an apprenticeship placement.

2022
Completed

The share of girls choosing civil engineering and technology and industrial subjects at upper secondary level was record high in 2022. As in previous years, there are big differences between the genders. In 2013, just under five percent of the students in construction and civil engineering were girls, while just over 12 percent of students in technology and industrial subjects were girls. In 2022, the proportion of girls was 11 and 18 percent respectively.

Bodies responsible

This section lists main bodies that are responsible for the implementation of the policy development or for its specific parts or activities, as indicated in the regulatory acts. The responsibilities are usually explained in its description.
  • Ministry of Education and Research (KD)

Target groups

Those who are positively and directly affected by the measures of the policy development; those on the list are specifically defined in the EU VET policy documents. A policy development can be addressed to one or several target groups.

Learners

  • Learners in upper secondary, including apprentices
  • Young people (15-29 years old)

Thematic categories

Thematic categories capture main aspects of the decision-making and operation of national VET and LLL systems. These broad areas represent key elements that all VET and LLL systems have to different extents and in different combinations, and which come into focus depending on the EU and national priorities. Thematic categories are further divided into thematic sub-categories. Based on their description, policy developments can be assigned to one or several thematic categories.

Governance of VET and lifelong learning

This thematic category looks at existing legal frameworks providing for strategic, operational – including quality assurance – and financing arrangements for VET and lifelong learning (LLL). It examines how VET and LLL-related policies are placed in broad national socioeconomic contexts and coordinate with other strategies and policies, such as economic, social and employment, growth and innovation, recovery and resilience.

This thematic category covers partnerships and collaboration networks of VET stakeholders – especially the social partners – to shape and implement VET in a country, including looking at how their roles and responsibilities for VET at national, regional and local levels are shared and distributed, ensuring an appropriate degree of autonomy for VET providers to adapt their offer.

The thematic category also includes efforts to create national, regional and sectoral skills intelligence systems (skills anticipation and graduate tracking) and using skills intelligence for making decisions about VET and LLL on quality, inclusiveness and flexibility.

Coordinating VET and other policies

This thematic sub-category refers to the integration of VET into economic, industrial, innovation, social and employment strategies, including those linked to recovery, green and digital transitions, and where VET is seen as a driver for innovation and growth. It includes national, regional, sectoral strategic documents or initiatives that make VET an integral part of broader policies, or applying a mix of policies to address an issue VET is part of, e.g. in addressing youth unemployment measures through VET, social and active labour market policies that are implemented in combination. National skill strategies aiming at quality and inclusive lifelong learning also fall into this sub-category.

Supporting lifelong learning culture and increasing participation

Lifelong learning refers to all learning (formal, non-formal or informal) taking place at all stages in life and resulting in an improvement or update in knowledge, skills, competences and attitudes or in participation in society from a personal, civic, cultural, social or employment-related perspective (Erasmus+, Glossary of terms, https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/programme-guide/part-d/glossary-common-terms). A systemic approach to CVET is crucial to ensure adaptability to evolving demands.

This broad thematic category looks at ways of creating opportunities and ensuring access to re-skilling and upskilling pathways, allowing individuals to progress smoothly in their learning throughout their lives with better permeability between general and vocational education and training, and better integration and compatibility between initial and continuing VET and with higher education. Individuals should be supported in acquiring and updating their skills and competences and navigating easily through education and training systems. Strategies and campaigns that promote VET and LLL as an attractive and high-quality pathway, providing quality lifelong guidance and tailored support to design learning and career paths, and various incentives (financial and non-financial) to attract and support participation in VET and LLL fall into this thematic category as well.

This thematic category also includes many initiatives on making VET inclusive and ensuring equal education and training opportunities for various groups of learners, regardless of their personal and economic background and place of residence – especially those at risk of disadvantage or exclusion, such as persons with disabilities, the low-skilled and low-qualified, minorities, migrants, refugees and others.

Ensuring equal opportunities and inclusiveness in education and training

This thematic sub-category refers to making VET pathways and programmes inclusive and accessible for all. It concerns measures and targeted actions to increase access and participation in VET and lifelong learning for learners from all vulnerable groups, and to support their school/training-to-work transitions. It includes measures to prevent early leaving from education and training. The thematic sub-category covers measures promoting gender balance in traditionally ‘male’ and ‘female’ professions and addressing gender-related and other stereotypes. The vulnerable groups are, but not limited to: persons with disabilities; the low-qualified/-skilled; minorities; persons of migrant background, including refugees; people with fewer opportunities due to their geographical location and/or their socioeconomically disadvantaged circumstances.

Subsystem

Part of the vocational education and training and lifelong learning systems the policy development applies to.
IVET

Further reading

Sources for further reading where readers can find more information on policy developments: links to official documents, dedicated websites, project pages. Some sources may only be available in national languages.

Country

Type of development

Policy developments are divided into three types: strategy/action plan; regulation/legislation; and practical measure/initiative.
Practical measure/Initiative
Cite as

Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Measures against adverse gender differences in schools: Norway. In Cedefop, & ReferNet. (2025). Timeline of VET policies in Europe (2024 update) [Online tool].

https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/timeline-vet-policies-europe/search/29040