Sie sind hier

 
Please consent to cookies in order to use the reading list

Activities

Community activities are developed according to its objectives:

  1. Consolidating the knowledge base on apprenticeships in Europe and supporting knowledge sharing about apprenticeship systems and schemes.
  2. Generating knowledge: identification of research themes, thematic focuses, comparative analyses on specific topics.
  3. Networking: direct access to national contacts for expertise on apprenticeships, peer learning opportunities.

In 2019, community experts engaged in the update of Cedefop European database of apprenticeship schemes. New country and scheme fiches are being published in 2019 and 2020 based on the experts' new or revised information on the apprenticeship system or scheme(s) of their expertise.

In 2020, community experts, under Cedefop's coordination, contributed to a synthesis report on how the coronavirus outbreak affected apprenticeships in the EU Member States, Iceland, Norway and the United Kingdom, and what are the steps taken to address the emerging challenges (the 3rd version of the report was added in August 2020).

Moreover, the main 2020 activity for community experts focused on knowledge generation on two topics of their interest: (a) apprenticeship governance and (b) in-company training design and delivery. This activity is based on work carried out in 2019 by experts' preparatory working groups, under Cedefop's coordination.

As an outcome of the main 2020 activity, 21 short papers submitted by Community experts were included in the collective Cedefop publication on 'Apprenticeship governance and in-company training: where labour market and education meet' (published in September 2021).
The publication further documents Cedefop’s understanding that approaches to each topic may vary significantly between individual EU Member States. It also highlights that, even in cases of relative convergence, the fine details of how an apprenticeship scheme is designed and governed can make a significant difference to its relevance and quality, at least in stakeholders’ perceptions. Policy-making should take note of such details and their interconnections to understand how reforms can be better targeted and more effective and efficient.